The Los Angeles-based Church of Scientology today announced ownership of the undesignated designer proposed by the Intelligent Design (ID) political movement.
"Thetans are the designers," claims Church of Scientology spokesman T. Rob Gaylord. "In the primordial past, thetans brought the material universe into being largely for their own pleasure. The universe has no independent reality, but derives its apparent reality from the fact that most thetans agree it exists. This existence includes the conscious act of design."
"Xenu, the tyrant ruler of the Galactic Confederacy," continued Gaylord, "has on several occasions contested ownership of the magical Wand of Design —most notably after the volcanic inception of the human race— but currently the Wand is held in common by thetans."
"Totally preposterous," counters spokesman Conrad Barstow of Seattle-based Discovery Institute, leading proponent of the denascent ID political movement. "There is no 'designer.' Pro forma arguments challenge dialectical precepts of hypothetical and concursive obligations to an hierarchal structural formalization, heh heh, but concurrent designations preclude hyper-intensive proclamations adhering to precursor or causative factors for achieving extensive and directed endothermism, and that proves it!"
"There's a little saying we have around here," Barstow continues, "Design requires a designer no more than an udder requires an udderer… or… no more than a tree requires a treerer. Is that it? Wait… no more than a vowel requires a voweler… a sign requires a signer? Maybe I need a verb here… besides, this is our movement, and even though there isn't a designer, when there eventually is we own it!"
"The Discovery Institute should have seen this coming," comments Christopher Stimpson, Associate Director at American Institute of Christian Extremism and author of 'Don't Fear The Christians: An Insiders Guide To Christian Extremism.' "Lately both Muslims and Hindus have laid claim to the 'designer.' Denying a designer is part of Discovery's political strategy, to get creationism accepted bit by bit, leading eventually to eradication of the doctrine of separation of church and state."
"It begs the question, how does the imaginary science of ID serve Christians? According to our polls the vast majority of Christians don't have a problem reconciling their faith with science, strongly believe in separation of church and state, and consider both the ID movement and conservative Christians to be heretical." Stimpson continues, "Didn't Jesus say 'But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.'?"